Looks like Google has decided to move into Facebook territory and will soon be offering a social network they are calling Google+. Today’s XKCD sums things up nicely I think.
Monthly Archives: June 2011
This fall DC comics is rebooting their line, cleaning things up and streamlining their characters. This may seem odd to some, but really DC has a history of periodic reboots, so its not really that big of a deal. What is significant is the real reason behind the reboot. For those of you who are not in the know about such things, the descendants of Superman creators Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster have been involved in a lawsuit with DC comics to get the rights to Superman back. This lawsuit is a mess, the rights have been divided up, and I suspect no one is going to like the outcome. What we are seeing here is DC protecting its IP from the Siegel and Shuster estates, by significantly altering his costume and origin story.
Gene Colan was probably not the greatest silver age artist and in fact I didn’t care for some of his work. What Gene Colan did well was Dracula, his historic run on Marvels Tomb of Dracula is without a doubt the single best depiction of Dracula in comics to date. While not great horror, Tomb of Dracula integrated the character into the Marvel Universe pretty well, most of the stories were interesting and well done. I am certain Gene Colan will be missed by family, friends and fans alike.
I went to see the Green Lantern movie this afternoon. Green Lantern is by far my favorite comic book character and has always embodied what I like most about comic books. Because of this, there really was no way I was going to be happy with this movie. As I had stated in earlier posts, my expectations for this movie were low. I did not care for many of the design decisions and I felt Ryan Reynolds was not a good choice for Hal Jordan.
With all of that said, Green Lantern was not a bad movie. In other reviews, critics complained the CGI costume and the CGI background were difficult to watch and produced this surreal look of Reynolds head floating around a CGI universe. Although the CGI costume was a bit cheesy, they did a pretty good job translating it from four color art to the big screen, unlike some other attempts. The other effects were perfectly fine and well done. My only real issue was making the main villain of the movie Parallax, an amorphous cloud. This didn’t really work for Galactus in the 2nd Fantastic Four movie and was only slightly better here.
Overall the script was decent, the actors did well and the actions scenes were good. Frankly I am not sure why this movie was panned. I think it was better than all of the X-men movies, at least as good as Batman Begins and definitely better than the first Ironman movie. Green Lantern had some week spots, but as far as I can tell this was a pretty decent superhero movie and did a passable job with the Hal Jordan/Green Lantern character and story. Go see the movie, you won’t regret it.
Sorry about the lack of posts this week. It has been very busy for me. Hopefully I will get caught up over the weekend.
Cross posted from Facebook:
I was thinking of something Timmy said the other day – He wondered why we could come up with $15 a month to play MMOs but our budgets won’t allow money for investing. $50 for a new video game? No problem. $50 to invest in a stock? That’s just too much. (I won’t even get into how much we are willing to pay on new rigs or consoles).
So, I would like to challenge my friends to invest $15 a month in one stock for one year (or a $180 one time investment). If you think you can’t afford to, why not? Sharebuilder (part of ING) has no minimum investment and takes about 15 minutes to set up.
If you would like to join us please reply to this message with your stock pick. I’ll start: My stock is Vector Group Ltd. (VGR), a “sin stock” (VGR owns tobacco and alcohol brands).
Edited to add:
I purchased 9 1/2 stocks for my initial purchase and I’ve set it up to pull $15 a month from my checking account. Once I have deposited $90 into the account it will trigger another buy. I set it up this way because it cost $4 per trade, which is about 25% commission on a $15 buy or about 5% commission on a $90 buy.
Now let the divend payments begin!
The whole weenergate thing has brought up talk about whether or not cybersex with someone who is not your spouse really cheating. Personally, I don’t see cybersex as cheating any more than I consider masturbating to Playboy magazine to be cheating. Yes, it involves another person, but there is no physical contact, no exchange of bodily fluid, it is in effect masturbation and as long as both parties are consenting adults, it is harmless. Certainly there is something to be said about emotional cheating, but really if someone is emotionally hurt over a bit of hot online chat, they are probably being overly sensitive and your relationship likely has deeper problems. My advise to any one who walks in on their significant other having hot chat with some one else, is to get on your knees, ask them to read it all to you and go down on them while they do it. Trust me, this will do more for your marriage than acting like a child.
So apparently a high profile Democratic Congressman by the name Weiner sent out some pictures of himself in his underwear that show the outline of his penis to Twitter. All the political fallout crap aside, this brings up the question, in this day and age who is stupid enough to allow such pictures to get out of their control.
A grown, reasonably intelligent man, presumably somewhat tech savy, sends lurid pictures (Yawn) of himself to Twitter and then is horrified and offended that said pictures got on the Internet ? REALLY ? SERIOUSLY ? He should resign, but not because of this so called “Scandal”, he should resign because he is a full on idiot. Someone, please take the blackberry away from him, he obviously can not handle the responsibility that goes along with it like an adult