Okay, DC Retroactive: Green Lantern has been the comic book I have been waiting for all summer. It brings back Mike Grell and Dennis O’Neil to produce a new Green Lantern/Green Arrow story, hearkening back to the good old days of the 1970′s. I have blogged previously that I did not care for the previous instalments of the DC Retroactive series. Really though, there was no way this one could miss. Mike Grell is the best comic book artist in the history of comic books. Dennis O’Neil is the defining story writer of DC comics in the 1970′s and was responsible for the 2nd wind given to the Silver age in mid 70′s.
I have only two gripes with the book, both are fairly minor. First, the story separated Green Lantern (GL) and Green Arrow (GA) into to separate stories and they did not come together until the last pages of the story. I think the best GL/GA stories of the 70′s were those in which they were featured together and I think O’Neil missed the chance to write a great buddy story and replace the generally horrible Justice League: Cry for Justice as the most recent expression of the GL/GA relationship. My second complaint is the GA plot was closer to the GA of the 1980′s rather than the GA of the 70′s.
Beyond those two points, the writing and art of the first story were good. This is neither Grell or O’Neil’s finest work, the Grell art is far better than the O’Neil writing. By today’s standard, O’Neils story is weak, but by the standards of the time and in context of the the 70′s, the story accomplished what it was suppose to, which was show the characters as they were in the 1970′s. I especially enjoyed the panels where GL uses his ring to make a giant can opener and a tennis racket, in classic GL form in the 1970′s. The backup story was reprinted from Green Lantern #76 which was the beginning of the classic run by Dennis O’Neil and Neal Adams that ended abruptly with issue #89. The only issue that might have been a better pick was Green Lantern #85, the issue were GA finds out his side kick Speedy is a heroine addict. This was a good read, I enjoyed it all the way to the end, turned it over and read it again.
This week, MS-DOS is 30 years old. I do not bring this up out of some misplaced sense of nostalgia, god no I do not miss DOS in the least. I bring it up to point out how far we really have come, from 1981 to now. My only complaint with the linked story was the reference to Linux and the implication it was purely a command line only operating system, when by the late 90′s, Linux had a perfectly functional GUI.
I rarely use Windows outside of work for anything. I have one Windows program that I use with any regularity and it runs under WINE just fine. One of the things I do every so often that does require Windows is helping other people out. For this purpose I have always maintained a copy of Windows XP in Virtualbox for answering those odd questions I don’t know off the top of my head. Lately I have noticed fewer and fewer people asking me XP questions and increasingly asking me Windows 7 questions. So yesterday I took advantage of my MSDN account (thanks to my employer) and I downloaded a Windows 7 Home Premium iso and COA. So now the question becomes, how long should I leave the XP image on my system. Most everyone with a clue has moved to Windows 7, only the most stubborn people are hanging onto the last vestiges of XP and my usual response to people asking me questions about it is usually, upgrade to Windows 7, buy a new machine or reinstall Windows XP (and stay off the Russian porn sites). I suspect this will surprise a few people, who would expect me to tell them to install Linux instead. The problem with that is, then I would be supporting Linux for people who know even less about it, then they know about Windows, no thanks I say.
Several months ago I posted that I was looking forward to summer series of books by DC comics called DC Retroactive. This week the first three were released, Batman, the Flash and Wonder Woman. Where to start, where to start. The idea behind this series to present the character as they existed in the 1970′s in a new story and then reprint a story from the actual 70′s as a backup feature. In all three comic, the reprint story in the back was better than the featured faux 70′s story. The feature stories felt more like a caricature of the 70′s, than an actual story from the 70′s. The writers took all the bad things about stories from that time period and ignored all the interesting things being done.
While I think the reprinted stories in these books were better than the the featured stories, in none of these cases did I feel these were the best stories they could have picked. For instance, in the case of the Flash, they reprinted a mildly amusing time travel story from DC Presents, where the Flash teams up with Superman. From 1970 to 1979 DC published 120 issues of the Flash and I read a great many of those issues and at least 3/4 of them were better than the story they chose to reprint. The Wonder Woman story was the worst of the lot, both stories blew chunks, the Batman book was the best, but still fell short. This is not a good start to what I had hoped was going to be some fun nostalgic reads for an otherwise dull comic reading summer. Too bad.
I like Cracked.com, not all of their stuff appeals to me, but enough of it to make me venture there once a twice week to see they are doing. This list is not a “Best of” list, it is more like a list of Cracked lists that mildly amused me over the last couple of weeks. So take it for what it is.
1. 5 Rock Radio Classics That Actually Suck
2. 15 Best Songs That Are Totally About Masturbation
3. 5 Things Nobody Tells You About Being Poor
4. 10 Best Sci-Fi Films Never Made
5. 5 Things You Won’t Believe Aren’t In the Bible
I am so uncool, my own wife refused to send me a Google+ invite, I had to get one of the guys I work with to send me one and of course today after I signed up I got like three other invites. I suppose that is the way of it. Anyone who wants an invite, drop me a line and I will send you one.
So far it is pretty much a Facebook (FB), but It adds some options I do like. For instance I can break my friends into circles and then limit who can see the content I post by circle. For instance, the standard circles are Family, Friends and Acquaintances, I added Co-Workers as well. This way I can keep my Sisters and Co-Workers from seeing the pictures of Chad’s naked ass from the New Year Party in 1981, while inflicting said pictures on my Friends and Acquaintances.
FB does have the option to make Groups place all your friends into various ones and use it to control who sees what content, but the problem is FB Groups are clunky to make and use. It was a pain in the ass to go through my 44 FB friends and place them in a Group, I can’t imagine what that process would be like if I had 440. Although I suppose it would not be too bad if you started doing it early on instead of waiting until you have 440 Friends.
Since I have a love/hate relationship with FB, I am sure I will have similar feelings about Google+. I suspect all the gripes I have with FB, will probably apply to Google+ as well. For the immediate future, I do not see myself using Google+ any more than I use FB. In the mean time, Gizmodo has an article suggesting some things we should do to Google+.
PezWitch and I both have Kindles, I gave hers to her for her birthday and I bought mine with my Christmas money last year. We are both definitely fans of the Kindle, it is excellent device for delivering books to the reader. Last Friday, we bought a Simple Touch Nook Reader. We bought it for a couple of reasons, first Barnes and Noble (B&N) is having a Free Friday summer special where they give away free ebooks each week, second we wanted a backup ebook reader in case one of ours went south and third, B&N has some books not available on the Kindle and this gives is some flexibility.
Up front I am going to say I prefer the Kindle, it is easier to use and has some features not available in the version of the Nook I bought and I don’t see myself changing over to the Nook any time soon. Having said that, the Nook is a nice device and I could easily be satisfied with it. The simple touch is smaller than the Kindle, but retains the same screen size, primarily due to the use of the touch screen rather than a miniature keyboard. The Nook also allows the user to swap batteries and add a mini SD card to upgrade the storage space, neither of those things can be done with a Kindle. I found the interface to be a bit clunky, but this is offset by the touch screen which works very well.
Some of the things I didn’t like were for instance, the meagre storage space of 236 MB is simply not enough for any modern device. I suppose that was the sacrifice made to add a touch screen and keep the price at $139, but it still seems skimpy to me, at least they give you the option to add an mini SD card. As I said earlier the interface is a bit clunky and even with the touch screen is sometimes unwieldy. I am also more than a little annoyed that I do not get a discount for having a B&N Member card.
Over all, I think had I bought a Nook first, I would probably be very happy with it, but given I bought a Kindle first and I am more comfortable with it, I will probably stick with it as my main ebook reader.